City of Toronto Regarding City Wide Curbside Antennas

Photo credit: Electronic Design,
'Understanding Distributed Antenna Systems (DASs)'
wireless access nodes
 

It is critically important the City of Toronto not deploy curbside antennas for wireless use. If the city deploys the antennas, they will be electromagnetically radiating everything in the coverage areas and will create a complexity of problems.

~ Curtis Bennett

thermoguy
By Curtis Bennett

December 16, 2013

City of Toronto Re: City Wide Curbside Antennas p1
City of Toronto Re: City Wide Curbside Antennas p2
December 16, 2013

City of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario

Att: City Clerk
cc: Dianne Knight & Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission

Re: City Wide Curbside Antennas

Dear Sir/Madam,

It is critically important the City of Toronto not deploy curbside antennas for wireless use. If the city deploys the antennas, they will be electromagnetically radiating everything in the coverage areas and will create a complexity of problems.

At the same time the city is considering deploying the antennas, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission is meeting regarding the safety of nuclear facilities and the city would undermine objectives.

Here is a picture of the science the City of Toronto is relying on to protect their public from harm.
Sam Phantom
Sam Phantom
This is the Specific Absorption Rate test adopted by Health Canada, FCC and other governing bodies. This is the test used for cell phone manufacturers and Wi-Fi or smart meter was considered safe for 24/7 exposure because the laptop, tablets or wireless smart meter are not held against the head.

The problem with the science is the test on safety did NOT include the routers, antennas or wireless infrastructure or the required biological information associated with humans. The plastic head has salt water and a temperature probe in it. There are no organs, cells, nerves, brain, cell voltages, frequencies included; the SAR only considered whether water molecules were heating.
Safety Code 6 is the code for limits of human exposure and admits causation and biological plausibility is missing that link the frequencies to adverse health effects. Health Canada and industry report there isn't one peer reviewed study showing harm. That is because they left out the grid and the plastic head has nothing to do with biology.

As soon as you incorporate the antennas or grid, you have causality as to how people are hurt. The science is called electromagnetic induction and how we produce electricity. As soon as you incorporate the bio information associated with humans, you have biological plausibility and Safety Code 6 will change to accommodate the missing science. Last week a million 
dollars was awarded to people regarding a tower; Toronto curbside antennas are the equivalent of a tower.

Please link to the following document provided to the CNSC. http://www.thermoguy.com/pdfs/Cell_Phone_Radiation_and_SAR_TEST.pdf

Please contact the writer with questions on this frequency and biological weapon as applied.

Sincerely,
Curtis Bennett
Chief Science Officer
Interprovincial Journeyman Electrician(Red Seal)
Engineering Technologist
Adjunct Faculty for IHF & GEDI
33 Year Advanced Thermography Background
www.thermoguy.com
“Bringing the Invisible to Light Since 1979”

CNSC Related

twitter
Pinterest

Educational and Informational Purposes: All information on this site and all links that are linked to from StayOnTheTruth.com represent solely the opinions of their producers.

This information and links to more information are made available to you as a resource for your own research and evaluation not as an endorsement.

StayOnTheTruth.com is not in the business of persuading you or anyone else to believe anything that that is presented linked to from this site; however, it does encourage you to use all available resources to form your own judgement about very important things that affect your life.

Fair Dealing and Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair dealing' or 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in copyright law. In accordance with the Fair Dealing or Fair Use intention, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair dealing' or 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice. 

© Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved. "Stay On The Truth", Dianne Knight