"This is the reality of electrocuting a mom, dad and fetus with electromagnetic radiation exposure where governments have determined 24/7 exposure of Wi-Fi frequencies and wireless smart meters is acceptable. All of that exposure [is] based on a plastic head with a gel or liquid in it. The Specific Absorption Rate only tested the end use device, they didn't include the wireless radiation required to complete the circuit. Industry reports there isn't one peer reviewed study showing harm. That is because the plastic head doesn't have health, biology, organs or frequencies." ~ Curtis Bennett

Dr. Martin Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, and Merry Callahan, health advocate, presenting updated information on the health impacts of non-ionizing wireless radiation: "WiFi Health Effects Presentation to Portland Public Schools Board of Education".

Uploaded on 14 Jun 2010: Barrie Trower, retired British military expert on stealth weaponry and microwave radiation, outlines how wireless computer radiation can cause lasting genetic mutation in girls' ovaries.

Nuclear bombs on a pole

Painful conditions endured by the families of Garcia and Jasso are identical to those suffered by Japanese victims of gamma wave radiation after nuclear explosions at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Five decades of studies confirm that non-ionizing communications radiation in the RF/microwave spectrum has the same effect on human health as ionizing gamma wave radiation from nuclear reactions. Leading German radiation expert Dr. Heyo Eckel, an official of the German Medical Association, states, “The injuries that result from radioactive radiation are identical with the effects of electromagnetic radiation. The damages are so similar that they are hard to differentiate.”

"...Electromagnetic fields and radiation damage DNA and enhance cell death rates and therefore they are a Ubiquitous Universal Genotoxic Carcinogen that enhances the rates of Cancer, Cardiac, Reproductive and Neurological disease and mortality in human populations. Therefore there is no safe threshold level. The only safe exposure level is zero, a position confirmed by dose-response trends in epidemiological studies...."

~ Dr Neil Cherry