Here is a start of what is to come regarding wireless use. The Specific Absorption Rate test adopted for limits of human exposure isn’t even applicable science. The only reason there hasn’t been one peer reviewed study showing harm is because the test model is plastic and filled with fluid. The test model has absolutely nothing in common with human biology. One side refers to health effects and the energy sector should say the plastic dummy they use for a model has nothing to do with health and never will. The 2 sides are comparing apples and elephants.
Keep in mind towers have more than 1 antenna. Wi-Fi Routers are an antenna that electromagnetically radiate the entire classroom. That has 30 students plus teachers inside the electrical circuit and EACH of them have a multi million dollar lawsuit.
This couple was awarded 1 million and the energy company offered 26,000. Had the jury known of the damage to the building as well as the 4 children and 2 adults, the real damage could be in the millions per person. I have asked lawyers and wait for a response on what genetic mutation is worth per child? This is one lawsuit when everyone has a lawsuit.
The SAR test left out the smart grid radiating large areas. FortisBC during their application for wireless admitted to electromagnetically radiating 17,000 sq. kms or 6564 sq. miles. There are hundreds of thousands of people in the coverage area and EACH of the 100s of thousands of people in the coverage area have a multi million dollar lawsuit. That is separate of ALL the buildings, infrastructure, crops, trees, bees, salmon spawning and other damages. Municipalities will sue for billions and have a right to their claims now.
There is much more coming and this is the start as there will be billions of people seeking compensation. That doesn’t include the environmental, building and infrastructure damage.
Couple Fleeing Wireless Awarded 1 million dollars
Comment by Curtis Bennett
Educational and Informational Purposes: All information on this
site and all links that are linked to from StayOnTheTruth.com represent
solely the opinions of their producers.
This
information and links to more information are made available to you as a
resource for your own research and evaluation not as an endorsement.
StayOnTheTruth.com is not
in the business of persuading you or anyone else to believe anything
that that is presented linked to from this site; however, it does
encourage you to use all available resources to form your own judgement
about very important things that affect your life.
Fair Dealing and
Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided
for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted
material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by
the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance
the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social
justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this
constitutes a 'fair dealing' or 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in copyright law. In accordance with the Fair
Dealing or Fair Use intention, the material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have an interest in using the included
information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair dealing' or 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal
or technical advice.
© Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved. "Stay On The Truth", Dianne Knight
